Archive for May, 2009

THE TEST

Thursday, May 14th, 2009

It may be called summative assessment in field studies and research, but I know, and every teacher in my school knows, it is THE TEST.

In my fourth grade, five mornings were set aside in the beginning of May for THE TEST, also called the California Standards Test, a criterion referenced assessment written just for California students based on the standards taught in reading and math and used to identify the school’s Annual Yearly Progress, authorized by the No Child Left Behind Act.

In fact, every California public school child, grade 2 to grade 11, got to pick up a pencil and make dark bubbles.

On day one, my students took the practice test, so they were familiar with the test format.  In fourth grade, they must read the test questions in the booklet, but fill in a bubble on an answer sheet.  That’s a skill all in itself and, believe me, the class has filled in many bubbles, not just with the practice test provided by the state testing department.  Of course, you know this, if you’ve been teaching.

Then on day 2, they read passages and analyzed sentences and read more text until, in my view, their eyes crossed.  It’s a long test filled with spelling rules, punctuation and other writing conventions, grammar, and on and on and on.

Then on day 3, at my school another testing section was devoted to more reading, comparing stories, analyzing correct writing skills.  Another morning with a lot of rubbing heads and rolling shoulders to get the kinks out after hunching over their booklets for more than an hour and a half.

That’s all, folks…for the first week.  Two more days the following week were devoted to THE TEST.

Big change on day 4.  The test switched to math which my class tackled with enthusiasm, being high-achieving math lovers.  Well, most of them, but there were some who showed signs of fatigue, a few finishing way too soon, the signal for random filling-in-the-bubbles.

The last day, was more math.  The kids pulled out their rulers and scratch paper.  They turned the test pages sideways to see if that helped them compare polygons.  I forgot to say the class gets snacks each day, the idea being that food helps keep your energy up.  Gummy bears disappeared with abandon.

Then time was up and everyone went out to recess.  No more summative assessment for this year.  Unless a child was absent on one or more test days.  She would not be forgotten.  Someone would sit her down to read and calculate.  I don’t know about the 30 kids in my class, but I was relieved.  And grabbed some gummy bears on my way out to yard duty.

Before school this morning, the day after the last school-wide assessment day, I read an article about turning around 5000 low-performing schools in the nation (San Francisco Chronicle, “Obama wants to turn around…”, May 13, 2009).  How does the Department of Education know a school is low-performing?  From performance on THE TEST.

How has your school been doing?

Devil in the Details

Tuesday, May 12th, 2009

Just a glance at the websites for the White House and the Department of Education tell you big changes are emerging.  The sites affirm that students learn when teachers are retained-not laid off; that the day is long, the work is hard, and mentoring helps; that planning time can’t be ignored if reform is the goal.

As you’ve heard in the news, the sites declare the intention to improve early childhood education, high school graduation rates, student loans to help college attendance.  Sounds like the new administration is addressing the problems being flogged by various education blocs over the last eight years since the No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act was authorized.

The biggest change is the amount of funding for programs mandated by NCLB, a highlight of the federal stimulus package (February 2009) as well as the federal budget legislation (March 2009).

Interesting that governors on behalf of state school boards, if they want the funds, must agree to assure certain provisions: improve the quality of standardized tests and raise standards; enforce the requirement that the most highly qualified teachers are assigned equably among all students, rich and poor.

If Arne Duncan, Secretary of Education, and Barack Obama have been listening, why are so many in the education field upset?

The devil is in the details.

Some like Diane Ravitch in a mid-April post on the blog Bridging Differences, part of Education Week’s online magazine, say the administration is not doing enough to change NCLB faults (and there are many).   Dorothy Meier in the same blog says that there is national denial about the problem among voters as well as state governments.  The mantra is teachers are incompetent, unions are only thinking about pay, parents don’t care, public school districts waste money and so on.

On the other hand, Randi Weingarten, president of American Federation of Teachers (AFT), in an article in the New York Times (April 15, 2009) is quoted as saying “They’re trying to do reform with teachers, not to them.”

In California, however, the United Teachers of Los Angeles (UTLA) demonstrated at a school board meeting mid-April 2009, after 6000 teachers had been sent preliminary layoff warnings (pink slips).  The board members wanted to split the stimulus money over two years.  Only lay off 3000 school personnel next year?  How does that make sense?

And, on the NBC Nightly News, May 5, 2009, a short news clip outlined the problem with dividing up education stimulus funds among states based on existing government demographic formulas so that, for instance, Utah, which needs substantial additional funds, gets far less than Wyoming, which has a huge education budget already and spends much more ‘per pupil.’

It seems “how” changes are going to be designed and implemented bedevils the mind.

What have you heard in your state?

Take Care Productions blog has launched

Monday, May 11th, 2009

Stay tuned for our upcoming articles and news.  Subscribe to our RSS feed to get the most current posts.