In California education talk, the most important words are “achievement gap.” Next most important are the tangle called “school finance reform.”
The two problem/solutions are as thorny as the briar patch at the edge of the moat surrounding Sleeping Beauty’s castle.
As if more money in itself is going to solve the multitude of education needs to close the achievement gap, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is calling a special session in the Fall to design legislation ensuring the state’s ability to compete for Race to the Top (RTTT) federal funds.
Actually, the education world should be relieved that the real issues may finally come to the fore.
Federal Department of Education guidelines for any state plan expect measures to turn around struggling schools. This blog has outlined one of many proposals and its recommendations (post 6/30/09).
Lawmakers’ first argument will be about repealing California’s charter school cap, a no-no for the National Education Association (NEA). Their argument is that school governance by charter schools is only one of many options to improve the chances for low-income, at-risk students to achieve, while in the federal RTTT guidelines charter schools are being treated as the one best way to achieve student progress.
California students will benefit from the guidelines’ focus on the 5% of consistently under-performing schools. It will, however, require money to provide consistent staff development for on-site assessment and analysis tools that help students; train, recruit, and retain highly-qualified teachers; and supply resources to keep those schools running smoothly.
Which highlights the section in the governor’s proposal to retain highly-qualified teachers and administrators. For a long time, education articles have argued for pay arrangements to accommodate the difficulties for teachers in the most under-performing schools. In truth, coaches or advisors to support the teacher’s best practices and counseling services for students and parents would do as much if not more to create incentives for achievement.
The last two pieces of the federal Department of Education guidelines to be debated in the legislature’s special session will leave lawmakers teetering on the edge of the chasm. Improving accountability and linking student achievement to teacher performance are the most prickly of issues.
First, think about accountability. How the state uses the data from one summative exam a year to designate successful and unsuccessful schools does little good. How each school analyzes all the data collected from formative tests and uses it to diagnose what to teach next has been proven, for the few staffs trained in the techniques, to help students improve. How will schools improve student performance with no funds to train teachers how to analyze the data?
Next, as the NEA in its letter to the U.S. Department of Education says, “It is inappropriate to require that states be able to link data on student achievement to individual teachers for the purpose of teacher and principal evaluation.” Governor Schwarzenegger’s press release notes linked data may provide transparency, but numerous sources give reasons why it’s difficult for a single test’s data to inform anyone how one teacher assures that an under-performing school closes the achievement gap.
It will take a lot of compromise to fairly make choices about evaluation of highly-qualified teachers and a process to ensure proficient student achievement.
Have your eyes caught the words “money” and “funds?” In California (post 8/19) the tallest thorny vines surround the abysmal school finance system that hides the chasm, delicately referred to as the “achievement gap.”
No matter the bite from the $4.3 billion RTTT funds California might get if the legislature manages to rewrite education policies, one sure way to seal the achievement gap is to reform how state money is allocated to school districts.
Tags: accountability, achievement gap, charter schools, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, highly qualified teachers, National Education Association, Race To The Top, U.S. Department of Education