Posts Tagged ‘dropout’

Standing on the Corner

Wednesday, November 16th, 2011

Public school truancy begins a lot earlier than the public thinks. To overcome the barriers that make students opt to stand on the corner takes a lot of relentless effort.

Start with the small child who enters school unready, who moves from neighborhood to neighborhood, whose parent has no time for her. This is poverty–16% of the nation according to the latest Census Bureau supplementary data measures. Until hardship is overcome and families are stabilized, the school district that keeps accurate attendance data and employs personnel to assure a child’s on time daily attendance (home visits, clothes for children, doctor and dental appointments, family counseling services) provides the support.

If the student makes it through elementary school, middle school can be the truancy breaking point. On top of the problems that an elementary student faced, once an adolescent reaches puberty it takes tremendous strength to not be distracted by the desire to belong. Lack of tutors for difficult subjects and fewer counselors available to oversee student progress means attendance can drop again. It’s easier to stand on the corner than seek help.

The final hurdle is high school. Especially at schools in low-income neighborhoods, under-performing students have insufficient support to improve in high school, prevent moving one from one school to another, avoid homelessness and other family problems. It is easy to become the hidden student and finally the drop out. If the school district does not have budgeted funds to work with these “at risk” students, they disappear and become the unprepared jobless. See the data released Tuesday, November 15, 2011, from Stanford University in California that shows more proof of the demographics of low-income areas in large cities in the nation.

Is that what the United States wants?

Nowadays, the problem is not loss of manufacturing corporations in the U.S. The issue is production has improved with automated machines that need fewer humans to keep them going, i.e. fewer jobs. The people that keep their jobs have graduated from high school and have, at minimum, vocational technological training. An entire group of workers, aged 18-64, now jobless, were high school dropouts who didn’t even complete a General Education Development (GED) exam in order to receive a high school equivalency diploma.

Another large group of jobless workers has been caused by the housing market debacle which has led to the fall-off in construction. If the infrastructure jobs bill in Congress doesn’t pass, there will be another group that is under-educated and that can’t move into the high tech jobs that support the new manufacturing of the day.

What the government can do right now is pass the jobs bill for three reasons. One, to give a wage to construction workers so that the poverty rate falls. Second, low-income families will have time to support the education of their children from pre-school onward. The school can only do so much to keep students in the classroom. Three, teachers will be rehired in the school to help students learn.

Finally, the four states that have just been notified that they received U.S. Department of Education waivers to redo their plans to turn around programs should stress the science, math, and technology curriculum to prepare students for the workplace.

Standing on the corner, waiting for a job, is not fun.

Who Will Race to the Top?

Friday, July 31st, 2009

Race to Top money provides short-term grants for teacher professional development, teacher pay, standards-based assessment, and accountability for struggling schools.

Colorado is running a full-court press to compete for the Obama administration’s Race to the Top money for education reform.  The state’s Lt. Governor, Barbara O’Brien, says Colorado is well positioned to bring in some RTT money.

Colorado needs RTT and budget reform to meet kid needs

Colorado’s legislature, through its interim School Finance Committee, is also trying to revise its long-term strategy for funding public schools. The current school finance formula focuses on equity and adequacy based generally on district size. The state provides extra money to low-property-tax districts to “equalize” funding with high-property-tax districts.

The question remains: Is any of this funding adequate to achieve a “world class” public education system?

Colorado uses ‘categoricals’ for special-needs funds

The state uses “categorical grants” for special education, vocational education, gifted and talented programs, transportation, expelled and at-risk students, and English language proficiency. The current school finance bill, SB09-256, provides $230 million-plus in categorical funding for 2009-2010.

Does funding through categoricals meets the learning needs of kids?

Colorado just gets by ‘on the cheap’

According to State Senator Chris Romer, D-Denver and co-founder of the nonprofit Great Education Colorado, the state gets by “on the cheap” for education funding.  Colorado’s large middle- to upper-middle-class population provides a setting for middle-class kids who are “prepared for school” and have lots of resources at home. This advantage helps kids learn, despite the state’s near-bottom-of-the-nation financing for public schools.  The state is rated “average” in school performance across the nation.

But this low funding hurts kids in poorer homes who don’t have the same learning edge.

Poor kids struggle, unprepared for school

More than 65,000 Colorado kids under 5 years old live in extreme poverty, according to the Colorado Children’s Campaign. This number is growing faster than the national average. Eventually these children, and many other poor kids, end up in the state’s dropout statistics.

Most public school districts in the United States use free and reduced lunch as a “proxy” or predictor for at-risk kids. Dr. Alex Medler of the Children’s Campaign acknowledges that poverty is the largest umbrella indicator for at-risk kids.

Precise indicators exist to determine school funding and education reform

In Colorado, if a ninth-grade student has one or more F’s on a semester report card, there’s a 9 in 10 chance the child will drop out. Similarly, if a high school kid has 20 or more absences in a quarter, the child is at least 60% more likely to drop out. Fifty percent of dropouts have had at least one suspension in four years.

Student centered funding gives new approach to school finance

The School Finance Committee, concerned about dropout levels and under-performing public high schools, is looking at a student-centered funding system as a possible replacement for the current method.

Student-centered funding “drives funds to schools, with additional weights for school-based decisions.”   Schools will receive more money for English language learners, low performers, kids with lots of absences, etc.

The goal of student-centered funding is to give local schools more flexibility in dealing with diverse student populations. The system also can more closely connect budgeting with standards and assessment, providing more accountability.

Of course, any school-finance change begs the question of reform if it ends up that not enough money is in the system to begin with.  While the state is trying for school finance reform, Race to Top can provide the short term resources to give students a chance at excellence.