Posts Tagged ‘school finance’

Bright days go dark for school finance in Colorado

Wednesday, September 7th, 2011

Schools open early in Colorado.  In many districts, teachers start back the second week of August and kids arrive the 3rd week.  This year, in many districts, teachers arrived as they usually do to set up their classrooms, but they didn’t get paid.  No money.

This is the irony of working as a teacher in today’s environment in Colorado, where the spending-cuts Tea Party has many forceful adherents.

Fewer days, fewer hours for kids and teachers

Jefferson County (Jeffco) teachers  on the west side of the Denver metro area will take a 3 percent pay cut in 2011-12, based on five furlough days.  Three furlough days will occur out of professional development time, and two will occur around school holidays when students will also get an extra day off.

At a time when many students need to be in school more hours and/or more days, districts across Colorado are cutting both.

State’s largest district sees $100 million cut from budget over 4 years

Jefferson County’s general fund budget has declined by $60 million since its high point in 2009-10, just before revenue for the state budget contracted.  Another $70 million will likely go away through 2013-14.  At this point there’s no telling when the down trend will turn around, and even when it does, it’s likely to take years just to get back to ‘09-10 levels.

State continues to throw mandates at districts with no money

Despite the budget cutting at districts, the state continues to mandate work and other requirements.  Senate Bill 10-191 is an example.  This bill states that school districts will provide performance evaluations to all teachers annually, and to new and probationary teachers two to three times a year.

This state mandate is a good idea.  Teachers should be regularly and systematically evaluated.  However, management staffing to do these evaluations is lacking. Most management to staff ratios in business hit around 1 manager for 10 people or fewer.  The district’s staffing ratio is more like 1 principal to 20 or 30 staff at elementary school, and much higher at high schools.

The district has yet to figure out how to conduct on-site teacher observations, interviews, and written appraisals without adding substantially more administrators, at a time when citizens complain about the “excessive” dollars used to pay management staff.

Students’ needs are great as ever

At the same time, student needs haven’t declined.  The district has done some heavy lifting to raise test scores.  It has succeeded.  Compared to state data, the district has improved its test results on students meeting or exceeding proficiency in 17 categories on state exams, as opposed to 12 for the state.  As important, Jeffco continues to compete successfully with other metro area districts, even though it has experienced an increase from 20% to 30% of children considered low income, often with learning difficulties that need attention.

Money questions haunt districts

How much longer can a district with 81,000 students continue to march forward when money and related resources are marching backward?  Will today’s kindergarten class, graduates of 2024, receive the quality education they need and deserve because of declining revenues in 2011-12?

Will Colorado be able to build a strong economic base for today’s and tomorrow’s workers based on a weak public education foundation?  It’s usually a bright time when schools open their doors and windows in Colorado, but now, in 2011, the blinds are down, the hallways are dark, and too many doors for too many children are closing.

Don’t Buy New Texts, Save Money

Wednesday, August 26th, 2009

Textbook purchases are being put on hold!  It’s amazing to find out, not from my school district, but when someone says, “I saw in the paper….”

studying the latest math TG

studying the latest math TG

My dad passed on the article “Budget Cuts Put New Textbook Purchases on Hold,” by Seema Mehta, Los Angeles Times, August 8, 2009, just after I’d commented in this blog (post 8/12) about the impressive math textbook purchases in my school district for 2009-2010.  I didn’t see an article in the bay area newspapers.

The article puts in print what I’d been thinking.  Turns out the state legislators, closing that $24 billion budget breach last month, did it partly by waiving the textbook purchase regulations in the California Education Code.

This waiver came about in spite of the California State Department of Education’s longtime insistence on keeping up with “modern, state-of-the-art textbooks, not outdated, antiquated textbooks,” as stated by Jack O’Connell, state Superintendent of Public Instruction.

The article included lots of back and forth about pragmatics in the current California school budget crisis versus actual need for new texts as often as set in the Education Code.

In my view, I understand how high school history and government classes may want materials every 6-8 years to reflect the latest changes in the world.  I remember, though, when I was in high school not very long ago, we read many supplemental books, newspapers, and other paper articles to get another point of view.

Now, I teach elementary school in which the literature texts, math texts, and even social studies texts are current for much longer than the regulations say.

I agree with the commentators in the article about state money designated for textbooks only: in this crisis, use the money to keep teachers in schools, to keep the custodial staff in schools.  A clean, safe elementary school with highly-qualified teachers is the first requirement to make sure students succeed.

At the same time, if school finance was fixed, if California finance in general was fixed, we wouldn’t be in this mess, would we?